2003 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1967 Ford 17
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford 17. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford 17 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu (200 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 1967 Ford 17. (59 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1967 Ford 17. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 519 kg more than 1967 Ford 17. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 Ford 17 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Ford 17. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu (298 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 186 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Ford 17. (112 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2003 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Ford 17.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chevrolet Malibu | 1967 Ford 17 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Malibu | 17 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 298 Nm | 112 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 8.3:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1569 kg | 1050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 55 L |