2003 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1967 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 3,501 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu (200 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1967 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1967 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 334 kg more than 1967 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu (299 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 141 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chevrolet Malibu | 1967 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Triumph |
Model | Malibu | 2000 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3501 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 299 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 74.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.1 mm | 76 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1504 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 64 L |