2003 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1968 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu (200 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 165 more horse power than 1968 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1968 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 640 kg more than 1968 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Zastava 850 K is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Zastava 850 K. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chevrolet Malibu | 1968 Zastava 850 K | |
Make | Chevrolet | Zastava |
Model | Malibu | 850 K |
Year Released | 2003 | 1968 |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 848 cc |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1495 kg | 855 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2010 mm |