2003 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 7,446 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 211 kg more than 2003 Chevrolet Malibu.
Because 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chevrolet Malibu | 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Chevrolet | Oldsmobile |
Model | Malibu | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2003 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 7446 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1569 kg | 1780 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2960 mm |