2003 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1979 Volvo 66
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 3,501 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu (200 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 1979 Volvo 66. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1979 Volvo 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 684 kg more than 1979 Volvo 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1979 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chevrolet Malibu | 1979 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
Model | Malibu | 66 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3501 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1504 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1390 mm |