2003 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1981 Volvo 343
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Volvo 343. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Volvo 343 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu (200 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1981 Volvo 343. (117 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1981 Volvo 343.
Because 1981 Volvo 343 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Volvo 343. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu (298 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 138 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Volvo 343. (160 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Volvo 343.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chevrolet Malibu | 1981 Volvo 343 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
Model | Malibu | 343 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 117 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 298 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 88.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.1 mm | 80 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1400 mm |