2003 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1984 Fiat Ritmo
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu (200 HP) has 119 more horse power than 1984 Fiat Ritmo. (81 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1984 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 649 kg more than 1984 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu (298 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 171 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Fiat Ritmo. (127 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chevrolet Malibu | 1984 Fiat Ritmo | |
Make | Chevrolet | Fiat |
Model | Malibu | Ritmo |
Year Released | 2003 | 1984 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 81 HP |
Torque | 298 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 84.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.1 mm | 71.5 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1569 kg | 920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 57 L |