2003 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1999 Ford Econoline

To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 6,801 cc (10 cylinders), 1999 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford Econoline (302 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 2003 Chevrolet Malibu. (168 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 2003 Chevrolet Malibu. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1035 kg more than 2003 Chevrolet Malibu. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1999 Ford Econoline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Ford Econoline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Econoline (569 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 312 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Chevrolet Malibu. (257 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1999 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Chevrolet Malibu.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Chevrolet Malibu 1999 Ford Econoline
Make Chevrolet Ford
Model Malibu Econoline
Year Released 2003 1999
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3135 cc 6801 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 10 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 168 HP 302 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 4250 RPM
Torque 257 Nm 569 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 3250 RPM
Engine Bore Size 89.1 mm 90 mm
Engine Stroke Size 84 mm 106 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Vehicle Weight 1380 kg 2415 kg
Vehicle Length 4840 mm 5390 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 2020 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 2060 mm
Wheelbase Size 2720 mm 3510 mm