2003 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 2000 Mitsubishi SSS
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mitsubishi SSS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mitsubishi SSS would be higher. Both 2003 Chevrolet Malibu and 2000 Mitsubishi SSS are equipped with a 3,500 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu (200 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 2000 Mitsubishi SSS. (162 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 2000 Mitsubishi SSS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mitsubishi SSS weights approximately 336 kg more than 2003 Chevrolet Malibu.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu (298 Nm) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mitsubishi SSS. (270 Nm). This means 2003 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mitsubishi SSS.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Chevrolet Malibu | 2000 Mitsubishi SSS | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Malibu | SSS |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3500 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 162 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 298 Nm | 270 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1569 kg | 1905 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2790 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 71 L |
