2003 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 2002 Jeep Compass

To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jeep Compass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jeep Compass would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jeep Compass (210 HP) has 10 more horse power than 2003 Chevrolet Malibu. (200 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 2003 Chevrolet Malibu. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 89 kg more than 2002 Jeep Compass.

Because 2002 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Chevrolet Malibu. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jeep Compass (319 Nm) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Chevrolet Malibu. (298 Nm). This means 2002 Jeep Compass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Chevrolet Malibu.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Chevrolet Malibu 2002 Jeep Compass
Make Chevrolet Jeep
Model Malibu Compass
Year Released 2003 2002
Body Type Sedan Crossover
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3500 cc 3700 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 200 HP 210 HP
Torque 298 Nm 319 Nm
Drive Type Front 4WD
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1495 kg 1406 kg
Vehicle Length 4790 mm 4160 mm
Vehicle Width 1780 mm 1840 mm
Vehicle Height 1470 mm 1640 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 2660 mm