2003 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 2005 Ford E-150
To start off, 2005 Ford E-150 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Chevrolet Malibu. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Chevrolet Malibu would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 2003 Chevrolet Malibu. (168 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 2003 Chevrolet Malibu. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford E-150 weights approximately 1003 kg more than 2003 Chevrolet Malibu. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford E-150 (373 Nm) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Chevrolet Malibu. (257 Nm). This means 2005 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Chevrolet Malibu.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chevrolet Malibu | 2005 Ford E-150 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Malibu | E-150 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3135 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 257 Nm | 373 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 89.1 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 90 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1380 kg | 2383 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 3510 mm |