2003 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 2009 Ford Flex

To start off, 2009 Ford Flex is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Chevrolet Malibu. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Chevrolet Malibu would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Flex (262 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 2003 Chevrolet Malibu. (200 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Flex should accelerate faster than 2003 Chevrolet Malibu. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 603 kg more than 2009 Ford Flex.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Flex (336 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Chevrolet Malibu. (298 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Ford Flex will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Chevrolet Malibu.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Chevrolet Malibu 2009 Ford Flex
Make Chevrolet Ford
Model Malibu Flex
Year Released 2003 2009
Body Type Sedan Crossover
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3500 cc 3496 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 200 HP 262 HP
Engine RPM 5400 RPM 6250 RPM
Torque 298 Nm 336 Nm
Torque RPM 3200 RPM 4500 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 9.8:1 10.8:1
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 7 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1569 kg 966 kg
Vehicle Length 4780 mm 5130 mm
Vehicle Width 1780 mm 1930 mm
Vehicle Height 1480 mm 1730 mm
Wheelbase Size 2850 mm 3000 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 62 L 70 L