2003 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 2010 Ford E-150
To start off, 2010 Ford E-150 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Chevrolet Malibu. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Chevrolet Malibu would be higher. At 4,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu (200 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 2010 Ford E-150. (171 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford E-150. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford E-150 weights approximately 18 kg more than 2003 Chevrolet Malibu.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu (299 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford E-150. (232 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2003 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford E-150.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chevrolet Malibu | 2010 Ford E-150 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Malibu | E-150 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3501 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 171 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 299 Nm | 232 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1504 kg | 1522 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1725 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 62 L |