2003 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 1976 Opel Ascona
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Opel Ascona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Opel Ascona would be higher. At 3,354 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chevrolet Monte Carlo weights approximately 560 kg more than 1976 Opel Ascona.
Because 1976 Opel Ascona is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Opel Ascona. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Monte Carlo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Chevrolet Monte Carlo has automatic transmission and 1976 Opel Ascona has manual transmission. 1976 Opel Ascona will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Chevrolet Monte Carlo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | 1976 Opel Ascona | |
Make | Chevrolet | Opel |
Model | Monte Carlo | Ascona |
Year Released | 2003 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3354 cc | 1296 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4330 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2530 mm |