2003 Chevrolet Prizm vs. 1995 Mazda 626
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Prizm is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet Prizm (123 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1995 Mazda 626. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Prizm should accelerate faster than 1995 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Mazda 626 weights approximately 115 kg more than 2003 Chevrolet Prizm.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chevrolet Prizm (169 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda 626. (150 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2003 Chevrolet Prizm will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chevrolet Prizm | 1995 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Prizm | 626 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1995 |
Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1794 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 169 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1090 kg | 1205 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2620 mm |