2003 Chevrolet S-10 vs. 1966 Holden HD
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet S-10 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden HD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden HD would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Holden HD is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Holden HD (122 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2003 Chevrolet S-10. (118 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Holden HD should accelerate faster than 2003 Chevrolet S-10. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chevrolet S-10 weights approximately 270 kg more than 1966 Holden HD.
Because 2003 Chevrolet S-10 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Holden HD. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet S-10 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Holden HD (237 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Chevrolet S-10. (190 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1966 Holden HD will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Chevrolet S-10.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chevrolet S-10 | 1966 Holden HD | |
Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
Model | S-10 | HD |
Year Released | 2003 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2196 cc | 2930 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 237 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2700 mm |