2003 Chevrolet S-10 vs. 2009 Honda FR-V
To start off, 2009 Honda FR-V is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Chevrolet S-10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Chevrolet S-10 would be higher. At 2,196 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet S-10 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Honda FR-V (138 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2003 Chevrolet S-10. (118 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Honda FR-V should accelerate faster than 2003 Chevrolet S-10.
Because 2003 Chevrolet S-10 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Honda FR-V. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet S-10 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chevrolet S-10 (190 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Honda FR-V. (174 Nm @ 4300 RPM). This means 2003 Chevrolet S-10 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Honda FR-V.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chevrolet S-10 | 2009 Honda FR-V | |
Make | Chevrolet | Honda |
Model | S-10 | FR-V |
Year Released | 2003 | 2009 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2196 cc | 1799 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 174 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 6 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2120 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2690 mm |