2003 Chevrolet S-10 vs. 2011 Renault Clio
To start off, 2011 Renault Clio is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Chevrolet S-10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Chevrolet S-10 would be higher. At 2,196 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet S-10 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet S-10 (118 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 2011 Renault Clio. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet S-10 should accelerate faster than 2011 Renault Clio.
Because 2003 Chevrolet S-10 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet S-10 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chevrolet S-10 (190 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Renault Clio. (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2003 Chevrolet S-10 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chevrolet S-10 | 2011 Renault Clio | |
Make | Chevrolet | Renault |
Model | S-10 | Clio |
Year Released | 2003 | 2011 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2196 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2480 mm |