2003 Chevrolet Silverado vs. 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Silverado is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 8,128 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Silverado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet Silverado (340 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 180 more horse power than 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (160 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Silverado should accelerate faster than 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2003 Chevrolet Silverado is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Silverado will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chevrolet Silverado (488 Nm) has 237 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (251 Nm). This means 2003 Chevrolet Silverado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chevrolet Silverado | 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Chevrolet | Oldsmobile |
Model | Silverado | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2003 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 8128 cc | 3344 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 340 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 488 Nm | 251 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3650 mm | 2670 mm |