2003 Chevrolet SS vs. 1982 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet SS is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet SS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet SS (430 HP) has 267 more horse power than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. (163 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet SS should accelerate faster than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chevrolet SS (583 Nm) has 258 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. (325 Nm). This means 2003 Chevrolet SS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Chevrolet SS | 1982 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Chevrolet |
| Model | SS | Camaro |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6000 cc | 4995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 430 HP | 163 HP |
| Torque | 583 Nm | 325 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1290 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3080 mm | 2570 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 76 L |
