2003 Chevrolet SS vs. 2000 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet SS is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 9,371 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro (770 HP) has 340 more horse power than 2003 Chevrolet SS. (430 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2003 Chevrolet SS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chevrolet SS weights approximately 473 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Camaro.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro (926 Nm) has 343 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Chevrolet SS. (583 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Chevrolet SS.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Chevrolet SS | 2000 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Chevrolet |
| Model | SS | Camaro |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6000 cc | 9371 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 430 HP | 770 HP |
| Torque | 583 Nm | 926 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1660 kg | 1187 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3080 mm | 2570 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 64 L |
