2003 Chevrolet SS vs. 2008 Mazda 6
To start off, 2008 Mazda 6 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Chevrolet SS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Chevrolet SS would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet SS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet SS (430 HP) has 326 more horse power than 2008 Mazda 6. (104 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet SS should accelerate faster than 2008 Mazda 6.
Because 2003 Chevrolet SS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Chevrolet SS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chevrolet SS (583 Nm) has 438 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda 6. (145 Nm). This means 2003 Chevrolet SS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chevrolet SS | 2008 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | SS | 6 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6000 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 430 HP | 104 HP |
Torque | 583 Nm | 145 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3080 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 55 L |