2003 Chevrolet SS vs. 2009 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2009 Ford Ecosport is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Chevrolet SS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Chevrolet SS would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet SS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet SS (430 HP) has 363 more horse power than 2009 Ford Ecosport. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet SS should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Ecosport.
Because 2003 Chevrolet SS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Chevrolet SS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Chevrolet SS has automatic transmission and 2009 Ford Ecosport has manual transmission. 2009 Ford Ecosport will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Chevrolet SS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chevrolet SS | 2009 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | SS | Ecosport |
Year Released | 2003 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6000 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 430 HP | 67 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3080 mm | 2490 mm |