2003 Chevrolet SSR vs. 1965 Sunbeam Alpine
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet SSR is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Sunbeam Alpine. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Sunbeam Alpine would be higher. At 5,316 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet SSR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet SSR (296 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 205 more horse power than 1965 Sunbeam Alpine. (91 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet SSR should accelerate faster than 1965 Sunbeam Alpine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chevrolet SSR weights approximately 1154 kg more than 1965 Sunbeam Alpine. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chevrolet SSR (449 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 310 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Sunbeam Alpine. (139 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2003 Chevrolet SSR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Sunbeam Alpine.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chevrolet SSR | 1965 Sunbeam Alpine | |
Make | Chevrolet | Sunbeam |
Model | SSR | Alpine |
Year Released | 2003 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5316 cc | 1723 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 296 HP | 91 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 449 Nm | 139 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2154 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2190 mm |