2003 Chevrolet SSR vs. 1967 Mercury Brougham

To start off, 2003 Chevrolet SSR is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mercury Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mercury Brougham would be higher. At 6,721 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Mercury Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mercury Brougham (325 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 2003 Chevrolet SSR. (296 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mercury Brougham should accelerate faster than 2003 Chevrolet SSR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chevrolet SSR weights approximately 794 kg more than 1967 Mercury Brougham.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Mercury Brougham (602 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Chevrolet SSR. (449 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1967 Mercury Brougham will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Chevrolet SSR.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Chevrolet SSR 1967 Mercury Brougham
Make Chevrolet Mercury
Model SSR Brougham
Year Released 2003 1967
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5316 cc 6721 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 296 HP 325 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 4600 RPM
Torque 449 Nm 602 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 2800 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 2154 kg 1360 kg
Vehicle Length 4870 mm 5560 mm
Vehicle Width 2000 mm 1990 mm
Vehicle Height 1640 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 2950 mm 3130 mm