2003 Chevrolet SSR vs. 1967 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet SSR is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 5,316 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet SSR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet SSR (296 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 207 more horse power than 1967 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet SSR should accelerate faster than 1967 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chevrolet SSR weights approximately 984 kg more than 1967 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chevrolet SSR (449 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 291 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 Chevrolet SSR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chevrolet SSR | 1967 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Triumph |
Model | SSR | 2000 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5316 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 296 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 449 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2154 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2700 mm |