2003 Chevrolet SSR vs. 1968 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet SSR is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 5,316 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet SSR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet SSR (296 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 261 more horse power than 1968 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet SSR should accelerate faster than 1968 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chevrolet SSR weights approximately 1299 kg more than 1968 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Chevrolet SSR | 1968 Zastava 850 K | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Zastava |
| Model | SSR | 850 K |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1968 |
| Engine Size | 5316 cc | 848 cc |
| Horse Power | 296 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2154 kg | 855 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2010 mm |
