2003 Chevrolet SSR vs. 1969 Mazda 110 S
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet SSR is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Mazda 110 S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Mazda 110 S would be higher. At 5,316 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet SSR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet SSR (296 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 188 more horse power than 1969 Mazda 110 S. (108 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet SSR should accelerate faster than 1969 Mazda 110 S. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chevrolet SSR weights approximately 1188 kg more than 1969 Mazda 110 S. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chevrolet SSR (449 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 307 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Mazda 110 S. (142 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2003 Chevrolet SSR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Mazda 110 S.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Chevrolet SSR | 1969 Mazda 110 S | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
| Model | SSR | 110 S |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5316 cc | 1964 cc |
| Horse Power | 296 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 449 Nm | 142 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2154 kg | 966 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1610 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1180 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2360 mm |
