2003 Chevrolet SSR vs. 2001 Suzuki SX
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet SSR is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Suzuki SX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Suzuki SX would be higher. At 5,316 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet SSR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet SSR (296 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 170 more horse power than 2001 Suzuki SX. (126 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet SSR should accelerate faster than 2001 Suzuki SX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chevrolet SSR weights approximately 618 kg more than 2001 Suzuki SX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Chevrolet SSR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Chevrolet SSR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Suzuki SX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chevrolet SSR (449 Nm) has 343 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Suzuki SX. (106 Nm). This means 2003 Chevrolet SSR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Suzuki SX.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chevrolet SSR | 2001 Suzuki SX | |
Make | Chevrolet | Suzuki |
Model | SSR | SX |
Year Released | 2003 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5316 cc | 1298 cc |
Horse Power | 296 HP | 126 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 449 Nm | 106 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 2154 kg | 1536 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2460 mm |