2003 Chevrolet SSR vs. 2006 SsangYong Stavic
To start off, 2006 SsangYong Stavic is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Chevrolet SSR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Chevrolet SSR would be higher. At 5,316 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet SSR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet SSR (296 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 2006 SsangYong Stavic. (217 HP @ 6100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet SSR should accelerate faster than 2006 SsangYong Stavic.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chevrolet SSR (449 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 137 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 SsangYong Stavic. (312 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 2003 Chevrolet SSR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 SsangYong Stavic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Chevrolet SSR | 2006 SsangYong Stavic | |
| Make | Chevrolet | SsangYong |
| Model | SSR | Stavic |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5316 cc | 3197 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 296 HP | 217 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Torque | 449 Nm | 312 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1880 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 3010 mm |
