2003 Chevrolet SSR vs. 2012 Volvo C70
To start off, 2012 Volvo C70 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Chevrolet SSR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Chevrolet SSR would be higher. At 5,316 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet SSR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chevrolet SSR weights approximately 414 kg more than 2012 Volvo C70.
Because 2003 Chevrolet SSR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Chevrolet SSR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chevrolet SSR (449 Nm) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Volvo C70. (350 Nm). This means 2003 Chevrolet SSR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Volvo C70.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chevrolet SSR | 2012 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
Model | SSR | C70 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5316 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 296 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 449 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2154 kg | 1740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4582 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1836 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2639 mm |