2003 Chevrolet Tahoe vs. 1972 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 4,807 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet Tahoe (260 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 177 more horse power than 1972 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Tahoe should accelerate faster than 1972 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chevrolet Tahoe weights approximately 1017 kg more than 1972 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chevrolet Tahoe (393 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 258 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2003 Chevrolet Tahoe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chevrolet Tahoe | 1972 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Triumph |
Model | Tahoe | 2000 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4807 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 260 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 393 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2262 kg | 1245 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2700 mm |