2003 Chevrolet Tahoe vs. 1981 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 4,807 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet Tahoe (260 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 1981 Toyota Celica. (118 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Tahoe should accelerate faster than 1981 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chevrolet Tahoe weights approximately 1082 kg more than 1981 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chevrolet Tahoe (393 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 178 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Toyota Celica. (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2003 Chevrolet Tahoe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chevrolet Tahoe | 1981 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
Model | Tahoe | Celica |
Year Released | 2003 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4807 cc | 2562 cc |
Horse Power | 260 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 393 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2262 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2640 mm |