2003 Chevrolet Tahoe vs. 1982 Dodge Omni
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Dodge Omni. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Dodge Omni would be higher. At 4,807 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chevrolet Tahoe weights approximately 1267 kg more than 1982 Dodge Omni.
Because 2003 Chevrolet Tahoe is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Chevrolet Tahoe. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Dodge Omni, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chevrolet Tahoe | 1982 Dodge Omni | |
Make | Chevrolet | Dodge |
Model | Tahoe | Omni |
Year Released | 2003 | 1982 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4807 cc | 1716 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 260 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2262 kg | 995 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2530 mm |