2003 Chevrolet Tahoe vs. 1997 Renault Helem
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Renault Helem. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Renault Helem would be higher. At 4,807 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Renault Helem (510 HP) has 250 more horse power than 2003 Chevrolet Tahoe. (260 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Renault Helem should accelerate faster than 2003 Chevrolet Tahoe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chevrolet Tahoe weights approximately 612 kg more than 1997 Renault Helem.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chevrolet Tahoe (393 Nm) has 308 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Renault Helem. (85 Nm). This means 2003 Chevrolet Tahoe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Renault Helem.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chevrolet Tahoe | 1997 Renault Helem | |
Make | Chevrolet | Renault |
Model | Tahoe | Helem |
Year Released | 2003 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 4807 cc | 2975 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 260 HP | 510 HP |
Torque | 393 Nm | 85 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2262 kg | 1650 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2680 mm |