2003 Chevrolet Tahoe vs. 2000 Matra-Simca M72
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Matra-Simca M72. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Matra-Simca M72 would be higher. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet Tahoe (260 HP) has 210 more horse power than 2000 Matra-Simca M72. (50 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Tahoe should accelerate faster than 2000 Matra-Simca M72.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Chevrolet Tahoe | 2000 Matra-Simca M72 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Matra-Simca |
| Model | Tahoe | M72 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Horse Power | 260 HP | 50 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 2 seats |
