2003 Chevrolet Tahoe vs. 2001 Jaguar XK

To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 4,807 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Jaguar XK (290 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2003 Chevrolet Tahoe. (260 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2003 Chevrolet Tahoe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chevrolet Tahoe weights approximately 562 kg more than 2001 Jaguar XK.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 393 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Chevrolet Tahoe 2001 Jaguar XK
Make Chevrolet Jaguar
Model Tahoe XK
Year Released 2003 2001
Body Type SUV Convertible
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4807 cc 3995 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 260 HP 290 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 6100 RPM
Torque 393 Nm 393 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 4250 RPM
Engine Bore Size 96 mm 86 mm
Engine Stroke Size 83 mm 86 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 6 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 2262 kg 1700 kg
Vehicle Length 5060 mm 4770 mm
Vehicle Width 2010 mm 1840 mm
Vehicle Height 1890 mm 1320 mm
Wheelbase Size 2950 mm 2600 mm