2003 Chevrolet Tahoe vs. 2001 Skoda Fabia
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Skoda Fabia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Skoda Fabia would be higher. At 4,807 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet Tahoe (260 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 2001 Skoda Fabia. (128 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Tahoe should accelerate faster than 2001 Skoda Fabia.
Because 2003 Chevrolet Tahoe is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Chevrolet Tahoe. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Skoda Fabia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chevrolet Tahoe (393 Nm) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Skoda Fabia. (310 Nm). This means 2003 Chevrolet Tahoe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Skoda Fabia.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Chevrolet Tahoe | 2001 Skoda Fabia | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Skoda |
| Model | Tahoe | Fabia |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4807 cc | 1984 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 260 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 393 Nm | 310 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 4 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2470 mm |
