2003 Chevrolet Tahoe vs. 2005 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2005 Westfield XTR 2 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Chevrolet Tahoe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Chevrolet Tahoe would be higher. At 4,807 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet Tahoe (260 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 2005 Westfield XTR 2. (173 HP @ 9800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Tahoe should accelerate faster than 2005 Westfield XTR 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chevrolet Tahoe weights approximately 1822 kg more than 2005 Westfield XTR 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Chevrolet Tahoe | 2005 Westfield XTR 2 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Westfield |
| Model | Tahoe | XTR 2 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 4807 cc | 1297 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 260 HP | 173 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 9800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2262 kg | 440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 3690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2320 mm |
