2003 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1953 Maserati A6G
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 1,954 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Maserati A6G is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Maserati A6G (100 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2003 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1953 Maserati A6G should accelerate faster than 2003 Chevrolet Tracker.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chevrolet Tracker | 1953 Maserati A6G | |
Make | Chevrolet | Maserati |
Model | Tracker | A6G |
Year Released | 2003 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 1954 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2560 mm |