2003 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1953 Triumph Mayflower
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Triumph Mayflower. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Triumph Mayflower would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1953 Triumph Mayflower. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1953 Triumph Mayflower.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Triumph Mayflower. (79 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2003 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Triumph Mayflower.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Chevrolet Tracker | 1953 Triumph Mayflower | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Triumph |
| Model | Tracker | Mayflower |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1953 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1590 cc | 1247 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 37 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 139 Nm | 79 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1580 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1580 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2110 mm |
