2003 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1957 Ford Anglia
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Ford Anglia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Ford Anglia would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1957 Ford Anglia. (31 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1957 Ford Anglia.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 Ford Anglia. (71 Nm @ 2150 RPM). This means 2003 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 Ford Anglia.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chevrolet Tracker | 1957 Ford Anglia | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Tracker | Anglia |
Year Released | 2003 | 1957 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 1172 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 31 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 139 Nm | 71 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2150 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2220 mm |