2003 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1958 Fiat 1200
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Fiat 1200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Fiat 1200 would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP) has 44 more horse power than 1958 Fiat 1200. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1958 Fiat 1200.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Fiat 1200. (82 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Fiat 1200.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chevrolet Tracker | 1958 Fiat 1200 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Fiat |
Model | Tracker | 1200 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1958 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 1221 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 139 Nm | 82 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2350 mm |