2003 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1959 Rover P4
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Rover P4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Rover P4 would be higher. At 2,286 cc (4 cylinders), 1959 Rover P4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1959 Rover P4. (67 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1959 Rover P4.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Rover P4 (169 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1959 Rover P4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chevrolet Tracker | 1959 Rover P4 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Rover |
Model | Tracker | P4 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 2286 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Torque | 139 Nm | 169 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2830 mm |