2003 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1959 Saab 95
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Saab 95. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Saab 95 would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1959 Saab 95. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1959 Saab 95.
Because 2003 Chevrolet Tracker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Chevrolet Tracker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1959 Saab 95, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Saab 95. (82 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Saab 95.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chevrolet Tracker | 1959 Saab 95 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Saab |
Model | Tracker | 95 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 841 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 37 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Torque | 139 Nm | 82 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2500 mm |