2003 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1964 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1964 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1964 Zastava 850 K.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chevrolet Tracker | 1964 Zastava 850 K | |
Make | Chevrolet | Zastava |
Model | Tracker | 850 K |
Year Released | 2003 | 1964 |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 848 cc |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2010 mm |