2003 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1967 Jaguar 240
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Jaguar 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Jaguar 240 would be higher. At 3,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Jaguar 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Jaguar 240 (208 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 2003 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Jaguar 240 should accelerate faster than 2003 Chevrolet Tracker.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Jaguar 240 (300 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 161 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1967 Jaguar 240 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Chevrolet Tracker | 1967 Jaguar 240 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Jaguar |
| Model | Tracker | 240 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1590 cc | 3442 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 139 Nm | 300 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2740 mm |
