2003 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1968 Humber Sceptre
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Humber Sceptre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Humber Sceptre would be higher. At 1,723 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Humber Sceptre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1968 Humber Sceptre. (82 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1968 Humber Sceptre.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Humber Sceptre. (123 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2003 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Humber Sceptre.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Chevrolet Tracker | 1968 Humber Sceptre | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Humber |
| Model | Tracker | Sceptre |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1590 cc | 1723 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 82 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 139 Nm | 123 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4310 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2510 mm |
