2003 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1972 Zastava 2101
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Zastava 2101. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Zastava 2101 would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1972 Zastava 2101. (62 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1972 Zastava 2101.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Zastava 2101. (87 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2003 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Zastava 2101.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chevrolet Tracker | 1972 Zastava 2101 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Zastava |
Model | Tracker | 2101 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1972 |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 1198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 139 Nm | 87 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2430 mm |