2003 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1973 Mercedes-Benz 250
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mercedes-Benz 250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mercedes-Benz 250 would be higher. At 2,523 cc (6 cylinders), 1973 Mercedes-Benz 250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Mercedes-Benz 250 (130 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 2003 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1973 Mercedes-Benz 250 should accelerate faster than 2003 Chevrolet Tracker.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Mercedes-Benz 250 (195 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1973 Mercedes-Benz 250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chevrolet Tracker | 1973 Mercedes-Benz 250 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Tracker | 250 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 2523 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 139 Nm | 195 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 5360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 3430 mm |